A Mo' Better Motown

"Deeeeeetroit Basketbaaaaall!"

I still get amped every time I hear John Mason's boomy baritone echo that phrase throughout the Palace at Auburn Hills. For years, those two words have been synonymous with that rugged, hard-nosed brand of basketball that the league and its rules committee have been trying to officiate into extinction. For too many years those two words have not been used to introduce a team seriously competing for another championship, which is bad news for defense and rebounding enthusiasts such as myself. The Pistons have not participated in the post season tournament since '09. Times have been tough for a team that once made it to the Conference Finals six consecutive times in the early aughts but like a couple of joyriding teens attempting a three-point turn, they could be turning this thing around.

The emergence of Andre Drummond and Greg Monroe certainly falls into the "good" category of a mostly bad and ugly season. 23 year old Monroe came into his own last year, averaging almost 16 points and 10 rebounds per game. In limited minutes, the 19 year old, 7 foot tall Andre Drummond looked far more impressive than his stats may indicate. In a league with a serious shortage of good big men, the Pistons appear to have found their starting center and power forward of the future, with cap room and cash left over to throw around in free agency. That made Joe Dumars' decision to ink power forward Josh Smith to a 3-year $54 million deal a bit of a surprise.

There are two schools of thought with regards to both drafting players and signing free agents. One says that you go after the player whose position and/or skill set best fills your team's needs. The other says that you go after the best player available, regardless of position or skill set. Joe Dumars apparently belongs to the latter camp. After Chris Paul and Dwight Howard signed elsewhere, Josh Smith became the best available free agent. Although his presence creates a bit of a logjam in their frontcourt, it undoubtedly upgrades the roster's overall talent. Many question Smith's attitude and shot selection but few can deny that he is a game changing force on both ends of the floor.

Despite being stacked in the frontcourt, this roster is far from a finished product. The backcourt is certainly an issue. In his 3 seasons, "Point Guard of the Future" Brandon Knight has been anything but a consistent floor general. Signing beloved veteran Chauncey Billups should help but having him on the roster creates a significant point guard controversy. Coach Cheeks needs somebody to get the ball to Smith, Monroe, and Drummond and when healthy, the 36 year old Billups is a far more consistent game manager than Knight. Perhaps having Knight move to shooting guard and play alongside Billups is the solution but hearing Knight's recent assertion that he is a point guard on Slam Online makes you think that he would be less than thrilled with the idea. The other option is to have Knight become the first point guard off the bench. This scenario could pay dividends down the road as one would be hard pressed to think of a better mentor for young point guards than Billups. It would also take one of the Pistons' most talented young players off the floor.

Guard play is not the only issue this team has. Far be it from me to say that they were a terrible jump shooting team but there were reports from several unnamed sources that the Pistons' perimeter players could not, in fact, hit water if they fell from a boat. The Pistons were one of the worst 3-PT shooting teams in the NBA last year. Dumars attempted to address this by drafting University of Georgia's Kentavius Caldwell-Pope in the first round and signing Italian league MVP Luigi Datome. Both are outstanding 3-Pt shooters. Both have taken as many shots in the NBA as I have. The two will be expected to play and contribute immediately so it is reasonable to expect that both will struggle at times next year. It is also reasonable to expect that both will one day become pretty good players at the next level.

Coach Mo Cheeks certainly has his work cut out for him. He is taking over a team without a Superstar, an identity, or a winning culture. He also has tough decisions to make regarding the starting lineup, how to divvy up playing time, and what to do with guys like Rodney Stuckey, Will Bynum, Jonas Jerebko, and Charlie Villanueva. On the other hand, he has a blank slate to work with, not to mention three very good big men, a veteran point guard, and a roster full of young and talented athletes. Expectations shouldn't be too high for a coach inheriting a 25 win team but fans could be pleasantly surprised by their improvement next year. Josh Smith and Chauncey Billups' presence alone make this team better. With the benefit of a friendly schedule and several teams in the Eastern Conference tanking it (I mean retooling their rosters while staying competitive), the Pistons could easily win 10 more games. Adding another piece (Rajon Rondo and Rudy Gay's names have been bandied about in trade rumors) could put them over the .500 mark, which in the East could mean more,

"Deeeeeetroit Basketbaaaaaall!"

come Playoff time.

A Rather Cavalier Attitude

If I were to ask you,

"What are the premiere destinations for NBA free agents?"

How would you respond? 

If all things were equal and you had to choose a place that a marquee free agent would like to spend a few years of his life, I guarantee that Cleveland would not be one of the cities mentioned. If you had to pick a team that a young star would like to play for, the Cavaliers most certainly would not be one of the organizations likely to roll off your tongue. Teams like the Knicks or Nets in the basketball Mecca of New York City would be more likely responses. Perhaps the Lakers or Clippers in La-La land (where they don't have an NFL team and NBA players are treated like rock stars!) might be in the discussion as well.

But all things are not equal these days. Franchises like the Lakers, Clippers, Knicks, and Nets in glamourous cities like Los Angeles and New York simply do not have the disposable cash to pay a marquee free agent like Andrew Bynum. 

The Cavaliers did.

This has been a productive offseason for a team coming off another disappointing 24-win season following Lebron's unceremonious departure. Now that I think about it, Lebron's departure was quite ceremonious. There was a prime time TV special to announce it and a big welcome party with fireworks, smoke machines, a marching band, dancers, and the whole nine. But that's another story...

The Cavaliers now have a center who can dominate the East as long as his knees remain unswollen. Teaming him up with Anderson Varejao (who was averaging over 14 and 14 last season) makes him even more scary. Add Tristan Thompson and Tyler Zeller into the fold and you have a very deep front court. Having this depth will actually help Anthony Bennet in the long run. This year's number 1 overall pick will have veterans to mentor him, young guys to compete with in practice, and will not be forced into the starting lineup and the unrealistic expectations that go along with it prematurely.

The Cavaliers already have a good back court. It could become a great one. Kyrie Irving is a star who has emerged as one of the best point guards in the East. There is no disputing that. There is also no disputing that he has not yet reached his full potential. After a stellar rookie campaign, Irving became the scorer and playmaker that the Cavs were hoping he could be, averaging over 22 points and dishing almost 6 assists per game last season. The reigning 3-Pt Shootout champ will undoubtedly make teams pay early and often when they double team Andrew Bynum. 

Dion Waiters was certainly one of the bright spots for the Cavs last season. Waiters is a natural shooting guard who can create his own shot. The former Syracuse sixth man also showed the potential to be effective in pick and rolls. Waiter's ability to catch and shoot the ball efficiently should complement Irving's playmaking abilities nicely. His 33 point game versus the Kings showed just how dangerous he can be when teams turn their focus on Irving. One would expect both Irving and Waiters' offensive efficiency to improve as the two get more comfortable playing together, which is a scary thought for a tandem already scoring almost 40 points per game.

Landing Sergey Kasarev with the 19th pick could prove to be the steal of the Draft. The Cavs have little depth at the small forward position and shoot the 3 very poorly.  This kid fills both of those needs. The 6'7" Kasarev is adept at playing both the shooting guard and small forward positions and shot a blistering 49% from downtown in the Eurocup tournament last year. The 19 year old lefty appears to be one of the most NBA ready European players available and could contribute immediately.

Bynum wasn't the only player the Cavs added via free agency. Earl Clark was the most promising young player that the Lakers had last year. The Cavaliers were able to lure him away with a $9 million contract that the Lakers had no way of matching. Los Angeles being a farm team for Cleveland. Who'da thunk it?! Jarret Jack was one of Golden State's most valuable players, particularly in the postseason. The Warriors were forced to release him to make room for Andre Iguodola which meant that the Cavs were able to swoop in and sign the Sixth Man of the Year candidate. 

Cavs' GM Chris Grant has taken his share of criticism over the past few years. Many disagreed with him drafting Tristan Thompson and Dion Waiters. Both appear to be panning out. Some criticized his lack of moves in free agency last year. You could just as easily argue that he was biding his time to sign impact players this year. Whether it is by luck or design, (or some combination of both) it appears that he has put together a very competitive squad that is poised to make the Playoffs. Seeing Irving and Bynum as All-Stars next year wouldn't surprise anybody. If Varejao has the type of season he had last year, him making it on the 2nd team isn't a stretch either. The Cavaliers making the Playoffs with 3 All-Stars on the roster. Who'da thunk it?! 

Ben Shapiro and I Discuss Why I Don't Like Lebron and the Heat

Chioke and I Talk About the Lakers

Not the Agreement We Collectively Bargained For

When the new CBA was introduced, we were all advised that it would take several years to really take effect. It is now officially really taking effect.

Is this a good thing?

I was under the impression that the higher luxury tax was supposed to break up the "super teams". This would give small market teams a chance to finally compete with the big dogs. Everything was going to change for the better. Nobody would have to burn Kyrie Irving's jersey in effigy; the blue chip players a team drafted would stay put. Teams with 3 Superstars would be a thing of the past and fans everywhere would rejoice at the parity. The Cleveland Cavaliers would play the Sacramento Kings in the 2015 NBA Finals!

The way I see it, here's what actually happened:

1. The Heat got even better with the addition of Ray Allen and Rashard Lewis
2. The Lakers are loaded with talent and were able to sign Antawn Jamison for about 75% less than what the Cavs were paying him.
3. The Memphis Grizzlies had to get rid of Rudy Gay, whom they drafted.
4. The Oklahoma City Thunder had to get rid of James Harden, whom they drafted.

That's not quite what they bargained for, is it? Two big market teams with deep pockets were able to stockpile Superstars while improving their bench. Two competitive, well-run teams in small markets were forced to trade away essential pieces of their roster.

James Harden was the reigning Sixth Man of the Year. He was an elite talent that wanted to stay in Oklahoma City but because of the luxury tax, the Thunder could not afford to re-sign him. We all know that there is no way James Harden would have been traded for Kevin Martin and Jeremy Lamb if money was not an issue. OKC's current success should not take away from how crummy this situation was for them. Let's face it, any team with Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook is going to be competitive. One could make the case that the team is playing better without Harden but that doesn't change the fact that the move was made to save money, not win basketball games.

The Memphis Grizzlies were one of the best teams in the league. They have a good coach and the best tandem of big men in the league. They had chemistry and in Rudy Gay they had a very good swing man playing with a chip on his shoulder. Unfortunately, Rudy Gay also had a lot of money owed to him. Memphis is a team that has trouble scoring points and they traded their leading scorer halfway through the season. Two weeks prior, they traded one of their best three-point shooters. These moves were made while the Grizzlies were off to their best start in franchise history.

Memphis GM Chris Wallace said (in so many words) that the trades were made to improve the team. I think he also mentioned something about having a lightly used bridge to sell. We all know that this was about dollars and cents, not wins and losses. In fairness, there is still a lot of basketball left to be played. Tayshaun Prince is a solid player with championship experience and a change of scenery could jump start Austin Daye's underwhelming career. Who knows? The Grizzlies may flourish without Gay like the Thunder have without Harden.

It won't make me like seeing him in a Raptors uniform any more.

Snubbed the Wrong Way

At 7 o'clock last night, the All-Star reserves were announced. Usually, this is a source of considerable stress for me. It never ceases to amaze me how often coaches, who are presumably knowledgeable and unbiased (the votes are anonymous and they don't get to vote for their own players) get it so wrong. You expect this from the fans, who for years could not cast enough votes for Yao Ming and Vince Carter. A great number of fans can be (how shall I put this delicately?) dumb as rocks.

I expect more from the coaches. The American people and the good fans in the ever-expanding international market expect more from the coaches. Each and every year scores of people around the world feel as though their guy was snubbed and some undeserving bum took his spot. This is usually the night where I shout from the internet equivalent of a rooftop about how a player I like got screwed by the powers that be.

Trust me, nothing would make me happier than to write a scathing article about how much more I know about basketball than the average NBA coach. There's only one problem; this year's All-Star reserves actually make sense to me. For the first time ever, the coaches may have gotten it right!

It is hard to disagree with their choices in the frontcourt.

In the West we have Tim Duncan, Zach Randolph, LeMarcus Aldridge and David Lee. All of them have All-Star caliber numbers. The teams they represent have winning records (the Spurs, Grizzlies, Trailblazers, and Warriors would be in the Playoffs if the season ended today) and all of them are integral pieces to their respective teams. The case could be made for Al Jefferson or Marc Gasol being a reserve but justifying who they would replace would be tricky. 

In the East we have Tyson Chandler, Joakim Noah, Luol Deng, Chris Bosh, and Paul George. Bosh is still one of the best players on the best team in the East.  Chandler's defensive presence has almost singlehandedly made the Knicks a legitimate contender. Noah has 20 double-doubles already. Deng (who leads the league in minutes played) has carried the Rose-less Bulls to 25 wins. George has taken his game to another level in Danny Granger's absence. The second year forward is averaging almost 17ppg and 8rpg and the guy hit nine 3-pointers in that Pacers/Pelicans game.

Like most Brooklynites, I  thought that Brook Lopez was having a good enough season to be a reserve. Unlike most Brookynites, I am not outraged by his exclusion. The way I see it, Noah, Chandler and Bosh are all better big men than Lopez is right now. You could make the case that he is having a better season than Garnett, but the fans made that decision.

Stephen Curry's omission could be the most controversial. He is averaging almost 21 ppg, 7apg, 4rpg and is currently ranked third in the league in 3-PT%. Curry has stepped up his effort defensively and has remained (almost) injury-free for the first time in his career. The Warriors have the fifth best record in the West and Steph Curry is unquestionably the catalyst for their success. I am a big fan of his but, which one of these guards should he replace?

Can an unbiased fan seriously see him taking Paul, Bryant, Westbrook, Harden, or Parker's spot?

Northwest Division Preview - Utah Jazz